<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bottlenecks: Part 1 of 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/bottlenecks-part-1-of-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/bottlenecks-part-1-of-4/</link>
	<description>Software Performance Engineering &#38; Testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:46:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bikash</title>
		<link>http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/bottlenecks-part-1-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Bikash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Hi,
 Really it is  good one. can u plz send me some material or  name of the sites where i can find  all the  bottlenecks that an application  have faced and how to fixed that type of problems. I am using  loadruner tool as for  performance testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
 Really it is  good one. can u plz send me some material or  name of the sites where i can find  all the  bottlenecks that an application  have faced and how to fixed that type of problems. I am using  loadruner tool as for  performance testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joychester</title>
		<link>http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/bottlenecks-part-1-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>joychester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47</guid>
		<description>When I found some CPU bottleneck which is over 90% utilization, then I will monitor which part of class or method is called most frequently and cost most of time to process.

so adding CPU is an easiest way but we cover some potiential issue by that way :)

Cheng Chi 
Performance engineer </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I found some CPU bottleneck which is over 90% utilization, then I will monitor which part of class or method is called most frequently and cost most of time to process.</p>
<p>so adding CPU is an easiest way but we cover some potiential issue by that way <img src='http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheng Chi<br />
Performance engineer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/bottlenecks-part-1-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Martin, you bring up some interesting points.  I will clarify the article to say that bottlenecks fall in 4 different &lt;i&gt;areas&lt;/i&gt; rather than types.  The bottlenecks you mentioned would fall into one of the 4 areas mentioned.  For example, on Solaris, OS interrupts are handled by a single CPU (or hardware thread for T1 architecture) as you point out, but this would be detected as a CPU bottleneck when you monitor the individual CPU utilization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Martin, you bring up some interesting points.  I will clarify the article to say that bottlenecks fall in 4 different <i>areas</i> rather than types.  The bottlenecks you mentioned would fall into one of the 4 areas mentioned.  For example, on Solaris, OS interrupts are handled by a single CPU (or hardware thread for T1 architecture) as you point out, but this would be detected as a CPU bottleneck when you monitor the individual CPU utilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Roth</title>
		<link>http://www.performanceengineer.com/blog/bottlenecks-part-1-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Actually, there are also more CPU bottlenecks than exceeding 80% on a SMP machine. E.g. on SUN Solaris clusters, the network driver is handled by a single CPU (in order to ensure that packets are handled in proper order), which leads to overload of a this CPU when there are many packets / s - even though the average CPU load is below 60%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there are also more CPU bottlenecks than exceeding 80% on a SMP machine. E.g. on SUN Solaris clusters, the network driver is handled by a single CPU (in order to ensure that packets are handled in proper order), which leads to overload of a this CPU when there are many packets / s &#8211; even though the average CPU load is below 60%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
